on the one hand, this policy would have positive effects on teenagers. firstly, they can spend more time with their family. as they would have to stick to this rule, they cannot go out as a particular time without accompanying a member of family who is adolescent.This person can be one of parents or brothers or sisters or a siblings who is relative. thus, he or she spend his or her time with a member of family or the whole family.
in addition, they would have more Security in that age. as teenagers would like to go out to stay friends, they would be on the verge of danger. this law and limit them to be at home at night or if they go out, must be accompanied by an adult. this leads them to being in a secure area on their supervision of an adult or the law.
what’s more, this is strategy can help teenagers find new friends more consciously. because teenagers are being accompanied by an adult, they wouldn’t select a new friend without permission of that companion. as a result, they would get advice from that older person in case of forming a new relationship, especially, at night, people who are out alone do not have a healthy lifestyle.
on the other hand, all of those this rule can limit the freedom of teenagers the benefits are worthwhile.
in conclusion, I believe that this policy have several advantages like forcing teenagers to stay with family and having more security as the last forming a healthy friendship with new people.