Some rules in the US are imposed by the government that would confide teenagers to go out at night without accompanying their parents. I think that it is a useful strategy and I will outline here.
On the one hand, it is an effective way for spending more time with their family. By imposing a rule that would limit teenagers to be at home at particular hours especially at night, they could spend their time alongside with family, which would boost their relationship with them, by facing more difficulty in the family they have to solve it and have more talks about it. Even if they would like to go outside, as they would have to go out with an adult, this bond would be maintained. Moreover, teenagers could be undersupervision by family. As they would allow to go out by an adult, that person who would accompany the teenagers is a member of family who is reliable for supervising the children. That adult person have an influence on teenagers for guiding them during night, so as to be safe , and they could apply the principlas which are acceptable by family, teenagers, for example, avoiding them from drinking alchoholic drinks or having fun with right peers. Furthermore, it is true to say that in this way teenagers would be more successful in their life. By being the family during the night or an adult in the outdoor, they could not form a peer group in which they act freely without any permission on that would have negative effects on them. As the principle of life in teenage years would form the future of them, and such peer groups would destroy the principle of having a successful life, it would be significant for teenagers to be accompanied by an adult in order not get involved in such destructive groups.
In conclusion, I believe that this rule would help family to have suitable control over teenagers by themselves or an adult who is a member of family that leads to having better supervision and forming an acceptable principle which are essential for a successful life in future and also forming a good relationship.
