These days, terrible news can be found at the front-page of the media. I completely agree with the statement that the media should shy away from spreading more bad news into society.
There are some reasons that the media try to present and to highlight terrible news. The central dynamic is that editors face a range of consideration, forcing them to exaggerate these topics. Firstly, they are under some pressure from owners to promote a particular view, such as political and social. Furthermore, these editors’ job is to make their media more profitable via prioritizing public interests, i.e. the more viewers, the better. Because their income heavily hindges upon the advertisement most of the time. If they come up with a new brilliant strategy for a product which contributes to the increasing sales of a company, they can raise their revenues. Unfortunately, only by shocking stories can they do that; what they believe.
There are, however, some strong reasons that journalists are better to welcome more pleasant topics. From psychology point of view, had it not been for the present editorial policies, a plethora of individuals would not have been depressed. To boost the health level of the society, it is vitel for editors to change their strategies. Moreover, the internet, newspapers, news channels, and the other sort of the media is for increasing the community’s awareness, not for trading profits. By spreading more disastrous news, people may lose their glimpse of hope or even their faith in the media. Thus, it is crucial for them to stop magnifying bad news.
In conclusion, I hold my opinion that it is of paramount significance for the media to give up publishing depressing topics; instead they should welcome a greater emphasis on optimistic titles to fulfill hopes in the society.
