It is generally argued that the contemporary types of human’s interaction have rolled out the necessity of writing letters I personally agree with the point of view , and believe the technology along with the modern lifestyle, which people experience these days, replace letters bit more efficient means of communication.
One of the main arguments against classic methods of interaction including land lines and paper-based letters is the technology offers alternative choices representing more rapid and affordable ways for people to access each other. Taking advantage of telecommunication technologies, phone and internet operators now claim that they not only cover the residence areas but also be able to cover majority of remote margins. Not only that, the affordable telecommunication devices along with the relevant social network applications constantly updated by developers and manufacturers have thoroughly depended communications on these products. Therefore, in this environment in which reaching people is fast and inexpensive, thanks to technology, applying matters to communicate maybe the last choice.
What is more, the new life style, which the modern era has put on the table, has particularly outdated the old-fashioned means of communication.
Indeed, people, nowadays, prefer Brief and fast methods to communication such as messaging with their relevant applications, in comparison with the tedious and time-consuming way of writing letters.
Another challenge with writing letter is, the letters are usually shipped to an address. In the past people were quietly static , in terms of clhanging their living places, so they rarely changed their address. Whereas, the new life style, in which citizens are used to move from one location to another, archiving this method of communication; writing letters is inevitable.
In conclusion, these days writing letters, as a classic method of communication, not only is not essential but also it does not meet the requirements of an efficacious way of conveyance.
